Schedule Appointment

Subfascial Breast Augmentation in Fayetteville, Arkansas

By Dr. Michael Spann, MD - Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon serving Fayetteville, Bentonville, Rogers, and Northwest Arkansas

If you're considering breast augmentation in Northwest Arkansas, you've likely heard about different implant placement options. Recent groundbreaking research published in Aesthetic Surgery Journal has confirmed what many of us leading plastic surgeons already knew: subfascial breast augmentation offers significant advantages over traditional subpectoral (under-the-muscle) placement.

At my Fayetteville practice, I routinely go subfascial during breast augmentation. Primarily due to the advanced Motiva implants - a combination that delivers superior outcomes with lower complication rates for qualifying patients.

What is Subfascial Breast Augmentation?

Subfascial breast augmentation places the implant beneath the pectoralis major fascia - a distinct, strong layer of tissue covering the chest muscle - rather than underneath the muscle itself. This technique:

  • Preserves your natural pectoralis muscle function
  • Provides excellent soft tissue coverage
  • Creates a natural, aesthetically pleasing result
  • Reduces recovery time compared to subpectoral placement

Subfascial vs. Subpectoral Results

A comprehensive 2025 study comparing 193 patients (386 breasts) found compelling evidence for subfascial placement advantages:

Dramatically Lower Capsular Contracture Rates

  • Subfascial: 1.1% capsular contracture rate
  • Subpectoral: 5.2% capsular contracture rate
  • This represents a statistically significant 79% reduction (p=0.04)

Capsular contracture remains the leading cause of breast augmentation revision surgery. By choosing subfascial placement, you significantly reduce this risk.

Reduced Lateral Implant Malposition

  • Subfascial: 8.8% malposition rate
  • Subpectoral: 23.4% malposition rate
  • 62% reduction in lateral displacement (p<0.001)

Lateral malposition causes asymmetry and often requires corrective surgery. The subfascial plane's superior anatomic support dramatically minimizes this frustrating complication.

Elimination of Double Bubble Deformity

  • Subfascial: 0% double bubble deformity
  • Subpectoral: 3.7% double bubble occurrence (p=0.02)

The double bubble deformity - where an unnatural fold appears below the implant - is notoriously difficult to correct and often requires multiple revision surgeries.

Equivalent Safety Profile

  • Both techniques showed acceptably low acute complication rates (1.0% overall)
  • No statistical difference in immediate post-operative complications

Why Motiva Implants Excel in Subfascial Placement

At my Fayetteville practice, I've observed exceptional results combining subfascial technique with Motiva breast implants for several key reasons:

Advanced Surface Technology

Motiva's proprietary SmoothSilk®/VelvetSurface® technology features a unique nano-textured surface that:

  • Promotes optimal tissue integration
  • Reduces capsular contracture risk
  • Maintains implant position without aggressive texturing
  • Combines the benefits of smooth and textured surfaces

Lower Documented Capsular Contracture Rates

Clinical studies of Motiva implants have demonstrated capsular contracture rates as low as 0.5-1% - even lower than the already excellent subfascial results in the recent comparative study. When you combine:

  • The anatomic advantages of subfascial placement (1.1% contracture rate)
  • Motiva's advanced implant technology (0.5-1% contracture rates in studies)

You create the optimal environment for long-term breast augmentation success.

TrueMonobloc® Design

Motiva's seamless, single-piece shell construction enhances implant strength and reduces the theoretical risk of gel migration, making them ideal for the subfascial plane where the implant has direct contact with breast tissue.

Who Is a Candidate for Subfascial Breast Augmentation?

While subfascial placement offers numerous advantages, it's not right for everyone. Ideal candidates typically have:

  • Adequate upper pole soft tissue coverage (typically >1.7-2.0cm at the lateral sternal margin)
  • Sufficient breast tissue to camouflage the superior implant contour
  • Good skin quality and elasticity
  • Realistic expectations about breast augmentation outcomes

For patients with minimal upper pole tissue, I may recommend:

  • Composite breast augmentation (subfascial placement combined with fat grafting)
  • Traditional subpectoral placement (when soft tissue coverage is insufficient)

The Subfascial Advantage for Active Women in Northwest Arkansas

If you lead an active lifestyle in the Fayetteville area - whether hiking the Ozark trails, practicing yoga, rock climbing, or strength training - subfascial breast augmentation offers particular benefits:

Preserved Muscle Function

Research has documented that subpectoral placement can reduce pectoralis major strength by 10-15%. By preserving the muscle's anatomic position and attachments, subfascial augmentation:

  • Maintains full upper body strength
  • Prevents animation deformity (implant distortion with muscle flexion)
  • Allows faster return to exercise and athletic activities
  • Eliminates the "pistol effect" where muscle contraction displaces the implant

Faster Recovery

Because the pectoralis muscle isn't disrupted, most subfascial patients experience:

  • Less post-operative pain
  • Reduced recovery time
  • Quicker return to normal activities
  • Earlier resumption of upper body exercises

What to Expect: The Subfascial Procedure

Comprehensive Pre-Operative Planning

Dr. Spann uses advanced measurement techniques and 3D imaging to:

  • Assess your soft tissue coverage
  • Determine optimal implant selection
  • Plan precise pocket dimensions
  • Set realistic expectations

Surgical Technique

The subfascial procedure involves:

  1. Precise incision placement (typically inframammary fold)
  2. Careful dissection in the plane just beneath the pectoralis fascia
  3. Pocket creation matching your implant dimensions
  4. Minimal-touch technique using a Keller funnel for implant insertion
  5. Meticulous closure with fascial reinforcement of the inframammary fold

Recovery Timeline

  • Days 1-3: Mild to moderate discomfort, managed with prescribed medication
  • Week 1: Most patients feel significantly better; return to light activities
  • Weeks 2-3: Return to work for most occupations
  • Weeks 4-6: Gradual resumption of exercise
  • Months 3-6: Final settling and optimal aesthetic result

Addressing Common Concerns

"Will subfascial placement look natural?"

Yes! The subfascial plane actually provides more natural-looking results by:

  • Maintaining breast tissue mobility over the implant
  • Preventing the "stuck-on" appearance sometimes seen with subglandular placement
  • Avoiding animation deformity from muscle disruption
  • Creating smooth upper pole contours

"What about implant rippling?"

With adequate soft tissue coverage and modern Motiva implants, rippling risk is minimal. Dr. Spann carefully assesses your tissue quality during consultation to ensure you're a good candidate.

"How long do results last?"

While breast implants aren't lifetime devices, the subfascial plane's superior stability and lower complication rates suggest longer-lasting, more predictable results. The dramatically lower capsular contracture and malposition rates mean fewer patients require revision surgery.

Why Choose Dr. Michael Spann for Subfascial Breast Augmentation?

Advanced Training and Expertise

Dr. Spann stays at the forefront of breast augmentation techniques, offering Northwest Arkansas patients access to the most advanced surgical approaches available.

Focus on Natural Results

Our philosophy emphasizes beautiful, natural-looking outcomes that enhance your proportions while maintaining your unique aesthetic.

Cutting-Edge Technology

We utilize the latest implant technology, including Motiva implants with their proven safety record and advanced features.

Personalized Care

Every patient receives an individualized surgical plan based on their anatomy, goals, and lifestyle.

Comprehensive Follow-Up

Dr. Spann and his team provide thorough post-operative care to ensure optimal healing and results.

The Science Behind Superior Results

The recent comparative study provides clear explanations for subfascial advantages:

Capsular Contracture Prevention

The pectoralis fascia creates a complete anatomic barrier between the implant and breast tissue bacteria - more protective than the partial barrier of released pectoralis muscle in dual-plane techniques. This biological mechanism explains the significantly lower contracture rates.

Enhanced Implant Stability

The subfascial plane preserves Cooper's ligaments to the chest wall, creating a natural "internal bra" that:

  • Stabilizes implant position
  • Prevents lateral displacement
  • Maintains aesthetic breast shape over time
  • Eliminates deformational forces from muscle contraction

Reduced Double Bubble Risk

By avoiding muscle release and maintaining natural tissue planes, subfascial placement eliminates several factors that contribute to double bubble formation in traditional dual-plane augmentation.

Important Considerations

Implant Volume and Complication Risk

Research shows that implant volumes exceeding approximately 330cc carry higher malposition risk regardless of placement plane. I carefully consider these findings when recommending implant size, balancing your aesthetic goals with long-term outcome optimization.

Not a Universal Solution

While subfascial placement offers numerous advantages, I maintains expertise in all augmentation techniques. For patients with insufficient soft tissue coverage, traditional subpectoral placement may still be recommended.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does insurance cover breast augmentation?A: Cosmetic breast augmentation is typically not covered by insurance. However, reconstructive procedures may qualify for coverage. We can discuss financing options during your consultation.

Q: How do I know if I have enough tissue for subfascial placement?A: Dr. Spann performs comprehensive measurements during your consultation, including pinch tests to assess upper pole soft tissue thickness. We'll determine the best approach for your anatomy.

Q: Can subfascial placement be combined with a breast lift?A: Yes! Subfascial augmentation can be successfully combined with mastopexy procedures when appropriate.

Q: What's the difference between subfascial and subglandular?A: Subfascial placement is beneath the pectoralis fascia but above the muscle, while subglandular placement is directly behind the breast gland with no fascial coverage. The fascia provides additional soft tissue coverage and support.

Q: Are Motiva implants FDA approved?A: Motiva implants are approved in over 80 countries and are available in the United States. Dr. Spann can discuss the regulatory status and clinical evidence during your consultation.

Q: How long until I can exercise after subfascial augmentation?A: Most patients can resume lower body exercise within 1-2 weeks and gradually return to full upper body training by 4-6 weeks - typically faster than with subpectoral placement.

Q. How much does subfascial breast augmentation with Motiva cost?A. Approximately $7,000 which includes all fees: OR, anesthesia, implant.

Schedule Your Consultation in Fayetteville, Arkansas

If you're considering breast augmentation in Northwest Arkansas, schedule a consultation with Dr. Michael Spann to learn whether subfascial placement with Motiva implants is right for you. During your visit, we'll:

  • Perform a comprehensive evaluation of your breast anatomy
  • Discuss your aesthetic goals and expectations
  • Review all placement options and implant choices
  • Create a personalized surgical plan
  • Answer all your questions about the procedure and recovery

Contact Dr. Michael Spann's office today:

📍 Location: 3733 N. Business Dr., Fayetteville, Arkansas 📞 Phone:501 219-8000 💻 Website: spannmd.com

Serving patients throughout Northwest Arkansas, including Fayetteville, Bentonville, Rogers, Springdale, and surrounding communities.

References and Further Reading

  1. Gougoutas AJ, Gilson A, Check J, Movassaghi K. Subpectoral vs Subfascial Cosmetic Breast Augmentation: Are We Ready to Settle? Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2025. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaf210
  2. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LR, Damasio RC, Auersvald A. Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):904-8.
  3. Shen Z, Chen X, Sun J, et al. A comparative assessment of three planes of implant placement in breast augmentation: A Bayesian analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(12):1986-1995.
  4. Motiva Implants® Clinical Data and Product Information. Available at: motivahealth.com

Disclaimer: This blog post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Individual results may vary. All surgical procedures carry risks. Please schedule a consultation with Dr. Spann to discuss your specific situation and determine the best treatment approach for your needs.

Dr. Michael Spann is a board-certified plastic surgeon providing expert cosmetic surgery services to patients throughout Northwest Arkansas.